Following the money: Tracking water infrastructure funding through Drinking Water State Revolving Funds

This dashboard was created to better understand and track how states intend to award funds using their annual allotments from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (DWSRFs), the largest financial assistance program for water infrastructure in the country, established by the 1996 amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Congress appropriates funding for the DWSRF, and EPA then awards capitalization grants to each state for their DWSRF based upon the results of the most recent Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey and Assessment (DWINSA). 

The Infrastructure Investments and Jobs Act (IIJA) - also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) - represents an influx of supplemental funding into the DWSRF over five years, on top of the base DWSRF funding for water infrastructure needs appropriated each year. It is imperative to track this unprecedented influx of supplemental funding - in addition to the base funding - to understand its impact in addressing water infrastructure needs around the country.

This dashboard draws data from Intended Use Plans (IUPs) and Project Priority Lists (PPLs) released on an annual basis by each state and submitted to the U.S. EPA for approval. The PPL catalogs, in priority order, the projects expected to receive DWSRF awards. IUPs, usually released in conjunction with PPLs, explain the state policies that determine how DWSRF assistance will be awarded to water systems who apply for funding.

This dashboard was launched in collaboration with the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) and the Massive Data Institute (MDI) at Georgetown University with grant support from The Rockefeller Foundation.

Do you have questions, comments, or concerns with the data in this dashboard? Please let us know by clicking the link below. We’d love to hear from you!

Glossary of Key Terms

  • This is a $1.9 trillion dollar legislative package passed by the 117th Congress and signed into law in 2021 in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. ARPA provided emergency grants, loans, and investment to provide economic relief to struggling families, restaurants, workers, and local governments. The ARPA State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (SLFRF) provides $350 billion in funding to state, local, territorial, and tribal governments. These funds can be used “to make necessary investments to water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure,” including for lead service line replacement. See this guide for more information.

  • Drinking Water SRF base funds have been appropriated by Congress each year as part of the annual federal budget and then distributed to the states per an allotment formula dictated by DWINSA.

  • The Safe Drinking Water Act as well as legislation appropriating funds to the DWSRF require states to provide a portion of each federal capitalization grant to disadvantaged communities (DACs) as additional subsidies. Most often, this is provided in the form of forgivable loans, also known as principal forgiveness. States have broad discretion over how to define DACs as well as other state policies that determine how additional subsidies are allocated. States use varying sets of criteria to define DACs, and so it can mean something different in each state.

  • The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) requires that EPA examine the needs for infrastructure improvements and maintenance at public water systems in the US. To accomplish this, EPA is required to conduct a survey and assessment every four years. The SDWA mandates that EPA use this survey to develop a formula to distribute DWSRF capitalization grants to states. By law, each state is guaranteed a minimum allotment of one percent of the total amount available to states. For each DWINSA, EPA uses a standardized methodology to develop a new allocation formula based on each state’s 20-year infrastructure need compared to the national need and accounting for the required one percent minimum allocation for each state. Starting in FY23, an allotment formula based on the 7th DWINSA will be used to distribute the DWSRF Base Appropriations, the IIJA/BIL General Supplemental, and the IIJA/BIL Emerging Contaminants funds. EPA used information collected in the 7th DWINSA on service line materials to develop a separate allocation formula to distribute the DWSRF BIL Lead Service Line Replacement fund.

  • This program was established by the 1996 amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), and is a financial assistance and federal-state partnership program to help water systems and states achieve the health protection objectives of the SDWA.

  • This is a term used by water quality professionals to describe pollutants that have been detected in environmental monitoring samples, that may cause ecological or human health impacts, but which are not yet regulated under current environmental laws. The class of chemicals known as PFAS (per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances), also known as forever chemicals and including PFOA and PFOS, are part of this broader term of ‘contaminants of emerging concern.’

  • The dollars allotted to states each year from the EPA. These are determined after Congress has appropriated funds and may be less than what was appropriated due to national set-asides.

  • The federal government’s fiscal year runs from October 1 to September 30 each year.

  • This legislation was passed by the 117th Congress and signed into law in 2021. IIJA authorizes funds for federal aid for highways, transit, broadband, water infrastructure, and other purposes, including $43 billion to states for water infrastructure through the SRF programs, $15 billion of which is specifically designated for lead service line replacement. See this guidebook for more information.

  • As a condition of receiving a federal capitalization grant from DWSRF appropriations, each state must prepare and submit an IUP to the EPA for approval. The IUP is a formal document that explains the policies that determine how DWSRF assistance will be distributed within the state. IUPs are prepared annually and subject to public comment and review before being submitted to EPA.

  • The risk of lead in drinking water largely comes from lead service lines. IIJA, through the DWSRF, includes $15 billion towards “lead service line replacement projects and associated activities directly connected to the identification, planning, design, and replacement of lead service lines.” EPIC and many states often refer to the shorthand of “lead” or “lead service lines (LSLs)” or “lead service line replacement (LSLR)” to describe this funding. In addition, the full service line from the public water main to the point at which it connects with premise plumbing is a DWSRF-eligible expense, regardless of the ownership of the property on which the service line is located.

  • This is funding that is distributed in the form of forgivable loans, meaning that, at the completion of a project, the community does not have to repay the loan. Forty-nine percent of the general supplemental DWSRF and LSLR funds appropriated through IIJA must be provided to state-defined disadvantaged communities as grants or forgivable loans. The remaining 51 percent is either set aside for administration, technical assistance, and other allowed drinking water needs or provided to communities as low-interest loans for water infrastructure projects. One hundred percent of the IIJA funding to address emerging contaminants must be distributed as grants/forgivable loans or set aside.

  • As part of the IUP, the state must prepare a list of prioritized awards that will be funded each year.

  • This legislation was originally passed by Congress in 1974 to protect public health by regulating the nation’s public drinking water supply, and was amended in 1986 and 1996. SDWA authorizes the EPA to set national health-based standards for drinking water to protect against both naturally-occurring and human-made contaminants that may be found in drinking water.

  • Each state has its own fiscal year, which may also run from October to September or alternatively from July to June or some other calendar period.

  • SRFs are financial assistance and federal-state partnership programs that provide low-cost financing to communities for a wide range of water infrastructure projects. The Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) supports wastewater and stormwater infrastructure and the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) supports drinking water infrastructure.

  • Drinking Water SRF supplemental funds were appropriated by congress for IIJA and are broken into three main categories: general supplemental, lead service line replacement, and emerging contaminants.

More About EPIC’s Work on State Revolving Funds

We conduct research, develop strategies, and work with states to reform their SRF policies to be more equitable by increasing the number of disadvantaged communities—particularly communities of color—that receive SRFs.

Engagement on State Intended Use Plans

Access to State Revolving Funds depends on state decisions about eligibility, project ranking criteria, and the provision of grants. EPIC analyzes and provides public comments on these decisions.

 

A Numbers Game for Lead Pipes

On April 4th, the EPA announced that, for the first time, it will be linking the estimated number of lead pipes to the amount of federal funding that states receive for replacing those pipes. This is an improvement, especially if more water systems develop more accurate inventories of lead service lines. That said, there is a lot to chew on with the new numbers of lead pipes and allotments to states, with some degree of uncertainty behind those numbers, too, and how changing inventories will be incorporated into future allotment formulas.