Opinion: Combating environmental crises requires investment from the private sector
Philanthropic and government dollars are perceived as ‘doing good’ for the environment, where private funding, with the same outcome, has a more sinister connotation. Many traditional conservationists think that it is immoral to profit from ecological restoration and conservation. I argue that that is not the case, that private involvement is necessary to combat the climate, clean water, and endangered species crises we find ourselves in. Development will continue to advance; we should embrace the range of solutions available to deliver environmental benefit along with it.
The Case for Crediting Wildlife Crossings
EPIC & CGS provide comments to USGS RFI to inform interagency efforts to develop the American Conservation Stewardship Atlas
Three changes to the mitigation rule to enhance successful tribal compensatory mitigation programs
How can tribes use mitigation banking for economic development?
How can tribes use mitigation banking for economic development?
Net Zero or Better: Priorities for Offset Policies that Benefit the Environment and Communities
Visualizing Tribal Mitigation Opportunities in the Colorado River Basin
An interview with EPIC tribal mitigation fellow, Mariah Black Bird
An interview with Tribal Mitigation Fellow Mariah Black Bird
Our thoughts on getting eagle mitigation right
Top 10 for Conservation in the Infrastructure Act
Colorado conservation bank aligns profit with species protections
Easements and their Role in Expanding Tribal Ecological Mitigation Opportunities
EPIC Applauds Senator Wyden’s Watershed Results Act

